By Mark Gurman and Shawn Donnan | Bloomberg
Apple Inc. has managed to dodge its greatest crisis such as Pandemia, for the moment, at least.
The 125% tariffs of Donald Trump about the goods produced in China threatened to turn their supply chain as seriously as Covid growl five years ago. On Friday night, the president of the United States gave Apple a great victory, exempting many popular consumption electronic products. That includes iPhones, iPads, Mac, Apple Watches and Alytags.
Another victory: the 10% rate on the imported goods from other countries has been eliminated for these products.
A new and low sector rate can still arise assets that have semiconductors, and a 20% rate still applies to electronics sent by China. Around the weekend, Trump promised that he will still apply tariffs to phones, computers and popular consumption electronic products, portraying exemptions such as a procedure step in a broader effort to redo US trade.
Even so, the moment for such movement is still uncertain. Until then, the surprise exemption marks a victory for Apple and an consumer electronics industry that is still based largely on the Asian nation for manufacturing.
“This is a great relief for Apple,” said Evercore Isi Amit Daryanani analyst in a note on Saturday. “Tariffs would have driven inflation of material costs.”
He hopes that the shares will recover on Monday after an 11% defeat this month.
Before the last exemption, the iPhone manufacturer had a plan: adjust its supply chain to make more iPhones with the United States united in India, which would have a leg subject to much lower levies. That, Apple executives believed would be a short -term solution to avoid the porcelain rate that fills and avoid price management.
Since iPhone facilities in India are on the way to producing more than 30 million iPhones per year, the manufacture of that country alone could meet a good part of the US demand. Apple, these days, sells around 220 million to 230 million iPhones annually, with approximately one third of those who go to the United States.
Such change would be difficult to achieve with a hitch, especially because the company is already in the production of snacks of the iPhone 17, which will be carried out mainly in China. Within the departments of Apple operations, finance and marketing, the fears had grown on the impact on the autumn of new phones and fed a feeling of fear.
The company, in just a few months, would have needed to achieve the kettle to transfer more iPhone 17 production to India or elsewhere. It is likely to have to obtain prices, something that is still possible, and fought with the suppliers for better margins. And Apple’s famous marketing engine would have had to convince consumers that it was worth it.
But the feeling of uncertainty remains. White House policies are likely to change again, and Apple may need to make more dramatic changes. At least for now, thought, management is breathing a sigh of relief.
The Ministry of Commerce of China described the move “a small step by the United States towards the correction of its illegal action of ‘unilateral’ reciprocal rates, and urged the United States to” take a great step by completely abolishing the unfair action and returning to the correct route to resolve differences through an equal dialogue based on mutual respect. “
However, smartphones other electronic devices that won exemptions will be part of a memory of semiconductors, according to the United States Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick.
Speaking on Sunday at ABC this week, Lutnick said that Friday at the end of Friday, exempting a variety of electronic products of 125% rates in China and a 10% flat rate around the Gobe, it was temporary, repeated, different and long data.
Another concern: if Apple moves even more China’s production at a fast pace, how would the country retaliate? Apple generates about 17% of its country’s income and operates store boxes, which makes it an atypical case among companies based in the United States. An Apple spokesman declined to comment.
China has launched competition consultations about US companies and could create problems for Apple through its own customs process. In recent years, it has also banned iPhones, among other devices designed by the United States, its legion of government workers. That followed an offensive in the United States against Chinese technology champion Huawei Technologies Co.
The iPhone is Apple’s largest money manufacturer, and about 87% of them occur in China, according to Morgan Stanley estimates. Around four out of five iPads are also carried out in the country, along with 60% of Mac.
Together, these products are responsible for approximately 75% of Apple’s annual income. Even so, the company now builds almost all its Apple Watches and Airpods in Vietnam. Some iPads and Mac are also manufactured in that country, and Mac production is expanding in Malaysia and Thailand.
The company generates approximately 38% of its iPad sales in the United States, as well as approximately half of its income Mac, Apple Watch and Airpods, Morgan Stanley estimates.
A complete division with China, Apple’s manufacturing center for decades, would be unlikely. He thought Trump has pushed Apple to do iPhones in the United States, the lack of domestic engineering and manufacturing talent will make it almost impossible in the short term.
The size and scale of the facilities in China make it unparalleled in speed and efficiency. China’s production is also crucial for Apple sales in the world beyond the United States. The company based in Cupertino, California, obtains almost 60% of its income outside the Americas.
Since a wave of rates were announced on April 2, Apple lobbyists and other technology companies have pressed to the White House for exemptions.
But the discussions on additional urgency in recent days after a series of reprisals of Tit-For-Tat between Washington and Beijing led to what amounted to 145% of the tariffs of China imports.
The potential impact was even more marked after Trump stopped higher rates in other countries. That meant that Apple Samsung Electronics Co., which makes its phones outside China, would have an advantage.
Apple and other companies have been stressed to the Trump administration that, although they are willing to increase investment in the US, there are few benefits to transfer the final assembly to the country. Instead, they have argued, the United States should focus on recovering more value jobs and promoting investment in things such as semiconductor production.
More stories like this are notable on Bloomberg.com
© 2025 Bloomberg LP
Originally published: